« Sam Ruby thinks WOA is excellent | Main | Add This to My Mashup Wishlist: Wikipedia Entries Sorted By Google Hits »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345285dd69e200e5506d71c28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What were we thinking?:

» Protocol Independence, SOAP and Leaky Abstractions from Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life
[Read More]

» Protocol Independence from Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff
Nick Gall asks What were we thinking? with regards to SOAP/WSDL and protocol independence. I tend to agree, but Dare Obasanjos arguments should not be ignored. Maybe I would feel similar if I had some Indigo/WCF experience, of if t... [Read More]

Comments

Jacek

Regarding the so-called SMTP binding, the W3C has produced a Note (not a Recommendation, but still intended to be useful) of SOAP Email Binding - see http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-soap12-email-20020626

As one of the authors, I fought hard to remove SMTP from the title, because the binding is in no way specific to SMTP, (it could have been called SMTP/IMAP/POP binding to be more , but still not fully, correct). Now I see that with that incorrect name the document would apparently be easier to find...

The comments to this entry are closed.