« Sam Ruby thinks WOA is excellent | Main | Add This to My Mashup Wishlist: Wikipedia Entries Sorted By Google Hits »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345285dd69e200e5506d71c28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What were we thinking?:

» Protocol Independence, SOAP and Leaky Abstractions from Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life
[Read More]

» Protocol Independence from Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff
Nick Gall asks What were we thinking? with regards to SOAP/WSDL and protocol independence. I tend to agree, but Dare Obasanjos arguments should not be ignored. Maybe I would feel similar if I had some Indigo/WCF experience, of if t... [Read More]

Comments

Jacek

Regarding the so-called SMTP binding, the W3C has produced a Note (not a Recommendation, but still intended to be useful) of SOAP Email Binding - see http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-soap12-email-20020626

As one of the authors, I fought hard to remove SMTP from the title, because the binding is in no way specific to SMTP, (it could have been called SMTP/IMAP/POP binding to be more , but still not fully, correct). Now I see that with that incorrect name the document would apparently be easier to find...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment